It’s become trendy lately to treat AI like some kind of ultimate authority in debates. People ask a question, get an answer, and go: “See? Even AI agrees with me!” As if the machine just dropped the final word on the matter. But here’s the truth: using AI as the final judge in an argument is downright dumb.
It’s become trendy lately to treat AI like some kind of ultimate authority in debates. People ask a question, get an answer, and go: “See? Even AI agrees with me!” As if the machine just dropped the final word on the matter. But here’s the truth: using AI as the final judge in an argument is downright dumb.
First, let’s get this straight: AI doesn’t think. It doesn’t generate new ideas or follow a logical train of thought like a human does. What it does is process your question and respond with the most statistically likely answer based on a massive pre-trained dataset. In other words, it’s just quoting the internet with impressive grammar.
Sure, you can use AI for basic fact-checking, but even that comes with a warning label. AI doesn’t reference actual facts — it references links. And what’s on the other side of that link? Who knows. Could be gold. Could be garbage.
This should be obvious, but apparently it isn’t: large language models aren’t conscious beings. They don’t have beliefs, opinions, or emotions. They are lines of code, powered by math and probabilities. So asking AI for an original opinion is like asking your microwave what it thinks about jazz.
If you try to argue with AI using real logic, it’ll lose — every time. Why? Because AI isn’t a thinking partner. It’s a very fancy mash-up tool. It’s great for mixing ideas, finding patterns, or giving you writing prompts. But when it comes to real debate, the machine folds.
I’ve seen more and more people treat AI like a wise old sage. “Look what ChatGPT said — case closed!” To me, that signals one thing: mental laziness. You’ve stopped thinking. You’ve outsourced your brain. That’s when I mute or block people — not out of spite, but because they’re no longer playing the game.
If you’re letting AI think, analyze, argue, and create for you — you’re done. You’ve checked out. You’re just a spectator now. And your brain? It’s rusting in the corner.
Let’s be fair: AI is amazing at simple tasks. Need to draft an email? Organize a to-do list? Summarize an article? Easy. But the more dense the meaning, the worse AI performs. Ask it to write a deep philosophical argument and... well, good luck.
AI also struggles to prioritize. It doesn’t know what’s crucial versus what’s filler unless you give it clear criteria. Without direction, it just dumps everything into the same pile.
Some tech guys love talking about “superintelligence.” Spoiler: it’s mostly marketing fluff. There are zero real pathways to create anything remotely close to human-level reasoning. Today’s AI just mimics the surface of intelligence. And when you throw even moderately complex logic at it — it falls apart.
This isn’t a hardware problem. It’s a conceptual limit. You can’t make a real brain out of statistics, no matter how fast the computer runs.
If you want to use AI effectively, you need to know what it’s good at and what it absolutely sucks at. Coding? Fantastic — code is structured, has strict rules, and uses minimal language. AI nails it.
But writing? Real writing? Forget it. AI can copy tone, style, even structure. But creating a text with actual originality, a narrative arc, and a meaningful point? Still out of reach.
Now, since most people barely read or write anything beyond a tweet, even a mediocre AI output seems “good enough”. It’s like someone raised on phone speakers thinking they’ve heard “great sound.” If that’s your bar — sure, AI is amazing. But don’t confuse fast food with fine dining.
AI is a powerful tool. But that’s all it is — a tool. Not your mentor, not your brain, not your compass. If you stop using your mind, AI won’t save you. It’ll just speed up your mental atrophy.
If you want real insight, start thinking for yourself again. And if you're into serious ideas without handing your brain over to an algorithm — check out menscult.net. We don't outsource thinking. We own it.
This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By browsing this website, you agree to our use of cookies.